Also in the news: The latest eruption of FaceApp's paranoia and shades of the first day of Amazon. Oh, and Elon Musk wants to pierce a brain in your brain.
Read Arielle's story about Twitter redesign right here. Read the story of Brian Barrett about FaceApp right here. Read the story of Adam Rogers about the latest sc-fi machinations of Elon right here. Read about Amazon's work problems right here, or follow the cover of WIRED on Amazon right here.
Arielle recommends staying on top of the latest news online by going to Reddit r / outoftheloop subreddit. Mike recommends the show Kantaro: The tooth taker with a sweet tooth on Netflix. Lauren recommends the book My year of rest and relaxation by Ottessa Moshfegh.
How to listen
You can still listen to this week's podcast on the audio player of this page, but if you want to subscribe for free to get all the episodes, here's how:
If you are on an iPhone or iPad, open the application called Podcasts, or just touch this link. You can also download an application such as Overcast or Pocket Casts, and search Gadget Lab. If you use Android, you can find us in the Google Play Music app just by patting here. We are on Spotify You can also download an application such as Pocket Casts or Google Podcasts, then search for Gadget Lab. here is the RSS feed.
Would you like to receive this two minute summary as an email every day of the week? Register here!
Jony Ive leave Apple
The chief designer of Apple, the man behind iconic devices such as the iPhone, the iMac and the iPod, leave the company. This is one of the biggest departures in the history of the company. "It seems like a natural and sweet moment to make this change," said Ive, who is leaving to create LoveForm, a creative agency that will count Apple as its first customer.
Twitter is finally going tweets from politicians in quarantine if they violate the rules
In the past, Twitter had fled to remove tweets from politicians, even if they violated the rules of the platform, because they considered the posts as "worthy of interest". This policy is finally changing. The next time this happens, the tweet will either be removed from the platform or grayed out, with a limited scope, with a warning that the user has violated the platform rules.
How do hackers transform Microsoft Excel? own characteristics against it
You may find Excel boring, but hackers find that it's fine: it's simple, well used and easy to operate. Hackers also do not have to fancy entering Excel, they just use its own features-like Power Query and macros-Against. The more features and workarounds a program has, the more vulnerabilities it has, which raises the question of why the program has some of these features.
If you are a cyclist, you know that not all cities are the same for the value of cycling. The Copenhagenize Index, published twice a year, evaluates "more than 115 cities worldwide with the help of 14 parameters focused on ambition, culture and street landscape design". The number one on the list? Copenhagen. Then come Amsterdam, Utrecht, Antwerp and Strasbourg. Womp, swing for Americans: There is not a single American city in the top 20.
Do you want to break that bottle of wine, but do not want to drink it all right now? Well, if you have $ 9, this little guy will keep your wine cool for days without all the complicated bells and whistles.
Desalination is booming as cities run out of water.
This daily report is available via the newsletter. You can register just here to make sure you receive the news in your inbox every day of the week!
Today, we are going to talk about BBB. Big Hype Energy.
Everyone needs a hype in his life to delight them in their greatest achievements and their milestones. The position is intrinsically neutral – no matter who can be a hype man, from your parents to your best friends, and especially to your partner.
The Twitter user @TreaTrea1 posted the reaction video that her boyfriend sent her after telling her that she had gotten the job that she had interviewed earlier in the day . Mind you, I was always at work, but I found a back room to panic and record how much I was fighting for his feat.
"Do you have the … do you have the job?" I say categorically. "Let's go fucking!" I whispered intensely, so he began to tear his shirt, then his cap, and then to be excited. Read more …
In a series of tweets starting Friday night and extending all day Saturday, President Trump condemned Facebook for prohibit a group of far-right personalities, including conspiracy theorist Alex Jones and anti-Islam commentator Paul Joseph Watson, as well as Twitter for having locked the narrative of actor James Woods. President Trump said he was "watching" the situation and even helped raise Watson's profile by retweeting his censorship video on YouTube – a video that was viewed over half a year ago. million times.
"These are the United States of America – and we have what we call FREEDOM OF SPEECH!" President Trump wrote About the bans He then retweeted a number of accounts with roughly the same argument.
Twitter's legal experts in the chair responded to the president's speech, noting that the first amendment prohibited only government to suppress the word, not private companies like Facebook and Twitter. Of course, if anyone knows, it should be President Trump. After all, it is the very argument that his lawyers at the Department of Justice have pleaded on his behalf in the courts.
In July 2017, the Knight First Amendment Institute and several Twitter users, blocked by President Trump, filed a trial against the president and several members of his staff. They argued that @realdonaldtrump is a "designated public forum" and that by blocking them, the president forbade them to answer, which violated their First Amendment rights. Last year, a district court alongside the complainants, noting that the President actually uses his Twitter account to carry out government activities, such as announcing the departure of Secretary of State Rex Tillerson or introducing a ban on transgender troops in the military. As a result, the court ordered President Trump to unblock his detractors.
But the Ministry of Justice has since appealed this decision, exposing the defense that appeared to justify the actions of Facebook and Twitter. "The constitutional right of an individual to express his or her views before a public forum only comes into play when the property in question is owned or controlled by the government and its exclusion from that property is the product of a state action ", Department wrote in his call memory.
A little over a month ago, Justice Department lawyers duplicated this logic. oral arguments, stating that the president has blocked people in private – not in his official capacity as president – and therefore perfectly entitled to do so. "If there is no action on the part of the state, there may be a violation of the first amendment," said DOJ attorney Jennifer. Utrecht. "The Constitution does not prohibit private parties from engaging in behavior that inhibits expressive behavior."
The complicating factor for the president in this case is that he is the chair. Not only that, but you used his account to conduct government business. Danielle Citron, a professor of law at the University of Maryland and author of the book, believes that the government is the only body that can violate the First Amendment, which gives Trump its habits on Twitter. Hate crimes in cyberspace. "He is the president." Every time the government creates public speech zones, the first amendment makes them very special, "said Citron.
The Justice Ministry has tried to go through rhetorical obstacles to argue that, despite this, the president is blocking people as ordinary citizens and therefore can not violate their first-amendment rights. "Donald Trump had the ability to block anyone from his @realdonaldtrump account long before his presidency," said Utrecht. "This is not an authority that he exercises by virtue of his duties."
Compare that to the position in which Facebook and Twitter are: they hold enormous power, of course, but that does not make them the government. Not only that, but the law that governs technology platforms It also explicitly asks them to make an effort "in good faith" to restrict the content they consider "obscene, lecherous, lascivious, dirty, excessively violent, harassing or otherwise objectionable".
If the Trump administration thinks that the president's Twitter account can not infringe on citizens' right to freedom of expression, it seems at best dubious to claim that a private company having no connection with the government can do it, says Lemon. "The idea that the president is free to block whoever he wants on Twitter because he's a private actor, then he turns around and criticizes Twitter for throwing people on their platform is incoherent," she says.
Of course, President Trump did not make a legal case in his weekend tweets. It only increased public pressure on an industry that has proven time and time again that this pressure is working. It is, after all, the fear of being accused of censorship by the Conservatives that led Facebook to fire all the human beings who chose the news published in his newspaper. Trend topics section C is the fear of accidentally hanging conservative politicians this prevented Twitter from automatically prohibiting the platform's white supremacists, in the same way that they forbid members of the Islamic state. It is this fear, combined with an idealistic and erroneous faith in human nature, that has forced social media companies to adopt such a moderate approach to content moderation, allowing the theories of hate and conspiracy to enrich and metastasize for more than ten years. .
Technology companies have made repeated, sometimes catastrophic decisions for fear of fanning a conservative reaction. Time will tell if this case is different.
Friday afternoon, Musk – a voracious tweeter and the head of Tesla, a SEC-listed electric car company – reached an agreement with the regulatory agency after February's Tweet on car production numbers.
Earlier in April, a Federal Court judge in Manhattan gave Musk and the SEC a few weeks to settle what the agency considered contempt even after Musk wrote a clarifying tweet. SEC set for Musk tweets were too ambiguous. The Musk legal team argued at one point that the SEC was trying to withdraw its First Amendment rights.
After a long discussion that lasted almost the entire month of April, both parties finally agreed on Friday new conditions for the settlement, mainly regarding what Musk can and can not tweet. Since the agreement was reached, Musk could not help but tweet about it.
He wrote in a conversation on Twitter about who I replied that "the nonsense that I say is entirely my fault", with an emoji to the language flashing. Someone said that Musks wrote "not a lot of nonsense". To which Musk responded: "some regulatory agencies would be different" in a clear call to the SEC.
Some regulators would not want to delay
– Elon Musk (@elonmusk) April 27, 2019
It all began in the summer of 2018 when Musk tweeted about taking Tesla privately. The SEC said the tweet violated federal securities laws and the two parties eventually settled. Part of this settlement (which also included $ 40 million in pesos) provided that Musk's tweets would be monitored, and it should be approved if it included "material" information about his company likely to have it. an impact on trade. It did not happen.
So, when this February tweet was broadcast, the SEC called it a violation of their agreement. And now we have a lot of clearer rules that Musk has to respect when I post them on Twitter. A complete list (with sub-chips!) Was included in the proposed agreement.
Musk now needs a pre-approval to tweet about anything from this list:
• the financial position, statements or results of the company, including
earnings or advice;
• mergers, acquisitions, disposals, potential or proposed takeover bids,
or joint ventures;
• production numbers or sales or delivery numbers (if real,
planned or planned) that had not been previously published via
Pre-approved written communications issued by the company
("Official Company Guidance") or to depart from the previous publication
Official orientation of the company;
• new or proposed business lines that are not related to existing systems;
sectors of activity (currently includes vehicles, transport and
sustainable energy products);
• forecasts, forecasts or estimates concerning the company
company that had not yet been published in Official Company
Orientation or deviation from the previously published official company
• events relating to the securities of the company (including Musk & # 39; s
acquisition or sale of the company's shares), credit
facilities, or financing or loan agreements;
• non-public legal or regulatory conclusions or decisions;
• any event requiring the filing of an 8-K form by the company with the
Securities and Exchange Commission, including:
• a change of control; or
• a change of director of the company; any chief executive
agent, president, chief financial officer, principal
accountant, responsible for the operation or any person
performing similar duties, or any appointed officer;
• other subjects such as society or the majority of independents
members of its board of directors may request, if they or
pre-approval of communications regarding these additional topics
protect the interests of the shareholders of the company;
Here is the complete agreement:
The next step is to get the judge's approval on the deal. Stay tuned.