Photoshop vs GIMP: comparison between the best program to edit free and best paid photos
Photoshop was not only the first program allowing the editing of professional photos, but it was also always the best. That's the reason why most tutorials or businesses use it because he's 29 years behind. So much so that the verb itselfphotoshopear"Or"chopeoIs he the one who talks about a mounted photo?
The program has been improved version after version, and its complexity complicates the task of many users. For him, GIMP is usually the best totally free alternative and easy to get without a lot of complications, and this makes it possible to make a wide variety of editions in the photos.
The first difference between the two programs is the price. Download GIMP is as simple as going to gimp.org/downloads and choose the torrent version or the direct download. In the case of Photoshop, we have to pay. The most convenient option is the Adobe Photo Package, which includes Photoshop and Lightroom for 12.09 euros per monthwith 30-day free trial.
Learning curve and interface
The learning curve of the two programs is slightly different, but it is essentially similar. In Photoshop, the learning curve may be longer, because there are certainly tools that make it easy to use first, but to be a teacher, you have to spend hundreds of hours, be recommended to follow a course or to see several tutorials.
GIMP is not easy to use and it is actually difficult to find as many tutorials as for Photoshop. In the right hands, you can achieve the same results as in Photoshop with GIMP, but it requires doing things differently. Photoshop has the extra point that he has technical support dedicated, and with GIMP, you will have to search for life if you are stuck or if you can not find a function.
At the level of interface the two are very similar, because GIMP is a bit based on the appearance of Photoshop, offering a dark mode, menus and bars with icons similar to Photoshop. In either case, you can hide parts of the interface so that they do not fill the screen. Traditionally, GIMP had many windows instead of integrating everything into an interface, and they gradually tended to turn to the latter.
Although they are very similar, it is important that you choose well with which you want to learn because once you learn to handle one, you will have to get used to each other if you want to change. In addition, GIMP requires the installation of several plugins to open certain formats, such as darktable to open RAW photos.
Despite this, the basic features are covered and you can add text, perform photo editing related to contrast, brightness, exposure, color, contour lines, etc. In both programs, we find hundreds of functions that we can combine to create the best possible content. In fact, unless you are a great professional, like a designer or an experienced photographer, you will find in both programs the same functions to achieve the same results.
So, Photoshop is the most complete, and GIMP reproduces its repertoire well, but there is many functions that escape. For example, the Fill to Content option (Content-compatible Fill) is not available in GIMP because it is an exclusive Photoshop feature. This feature has also been improved in CC 2019. This feature, which helps to fill gaps in photos without having to use the cloning buffer is ideal for removing content that you do not want to see on a photo, such as people, clouds or endless objects.
In turn, Photoshop has three types of brushes, while GIMP only has one. This implies what we said earlier: you can achieve the same results, but it takes more effort. It is also possible to add this Fill function according to the content with a plugin.
When you edit photos, Photoshop's menus are more complete and simple to use, especially with Lightroom or Camera Raw. With GIMP you have to change layer by layer. In addition, if you want a wider range of colors, GIMP does not support the color scheme. CMYK, something that Photoshop does. To all this, we must add that Photoshop, in addition to being the industry standard, is integrated with other company software. If you want to learn it for business purposes, it is best to use Photoshop directly.
One feature that Photoshop should improve and that GIMP has exceeded is the ability to synchronize settings between multiple photos. Although Lightroom allows it very easily, the process of Actions in Photoshop It's very tedious and difficult not to be able to easily reproduce the changes made from one photo to another. Another advantage of GIMP is that it is portable and that you can carry it wherever you want on a USB key without having to install it.
Performance and ease of use
As we said, you will probably need hundreds of hours to teach both programs. In Photoshop, however, these hours of use offer higher performance because they offer more features and, like many of them, allow you to edit, edit, or create content faster. There is an infinity of tutorials They explain to us what they are doing with the most basic function, in addition to basic user guides to familiarize us more quickly with both programs.
At the level of yield, Photoshop works much better than GIMP. With the latter, in fact, you will see how the image is rendered by the parts on many occasions, such as hiding a layer or adjusting an adjustment such as brightness or brightness. contrast. Photoshop is fluid and does not give a single tug. In addition, Photoshop is becoming more and more optimized for low-end computers, which GIMP has so far been able to gain, even though it consumes very little RAM memory. Unlike Photoshop, GIMP is available on Linux, while Photoshop is only available on Windows and macOS.
Another point in favor of GIMP is that the program occupies very little, with a download of only 200 MB. Photoshop, meanwhile, occupies about ten times more.
The plugins They simplify our lives a lot. In this department, he uses street Photoshop, although GIMP supports some of those available for Photoshop. These plugins help us do things we could not do without, or it would take us tens of minutes, even hours.
One of them is Portraiture, which softens the skin by choosing presets. If we do not use the plugin, we must make masks and go "paint" on the skin with different layer formats to soften the skin. This gives a more professional result, but if you have to do it for hundreds of photos, it is usually more convenient to use a plugin and automate the action. Other popular plugins are ON1 Effects, Photolemur and Luminar, which are exclusive to Photoshop and can take your photos to a level that you probably will not be able to do if you are a beginner.
In short, the conclusion is very logical: Photoshop is better at all, performance, ease of use, plugins and features. Despite that, it's paying off, and if you do not use all the features and just want to start experimenting with photography or creating content, with GIMP, you'll get more than enough.
Of course, remember that if you want to finally use Photoshop, it is best to start directly with this software so you do not have to adapt later. GIMP continues to grow with free updates and plugins developed by the community to replicate many of its features, but it will still be a step backward in the vast majority of features.