Last year 's model was a portable and slender power station, but the presence of the dreaded camera prevented us from really recommending it. You see, the XPS 13's webcam has been at the bottom of the screen for a while, allowing all the people you video chat to watch with a great view.
The 2019 model has finally moved the camera to the top of the screen, as it should – no more cam for the nose.
With 2.7 kg and 19 mm thickness, the XPS 13 is neither the thinnest nor the lightest machine on the market, but it's small enough to fit in hand luggage and enough light weight so as not to lug around it during the day. your shoulders
The 2019 XPS 13 looks almost identical to my 2018 model, which was the final version with a nose cam. The upper bezel is a few millimeters thicker to accommodate the new camera: the device that Dell claimed to have for years would simply not fit. But to be fair, Dell had to create the smallest 720p webcam on the market to install a camera. The resulting bezel at the top is slightly thicker (barely). The new model also includes a set of four microphones for better sound during calls and better results when you shout Cortana commands throughout the room.
The performance is solid, although it is by no means the leader on the market. All XPS 13 notebooks use eighth-generation Core processors. Depending on the amount you want to spend, you can choose an i3, i5 or i7. It supports up to 16GB of RAM and you can maximize the drive with a 2TB SSD drive. Up here, everything is fine, right? Unfortunately, the best graphics processor that you can get is Intel's built-in UHD 620, which means that the XPS 13 is not a gaming laptop. For light games, the Asus ZenBook S13 Can be a good choice. We have not tested it yet, but it has an Nvidia MX150 GPU and looks excellent in terms of specifications.
The review of the XPS 13 model that I tested was gray and white with an Intel Core i7-8565U processor and 16 GB of RAM, which represents the best available configuration. It had no problem managing my basic workload: Web browser, Slack, Terminal, Zoom, Pandora streaming to a Bluetooth speaker and some photo editing on the side. I also went through a benchmarking suite and found good performance for most use cases – just above average for an ultraportable laptop.
During my battery tests (playing a looping HD video until the laptop died), the Dell XPS 13 had about 12 hours of charge. This is enough for everyday use or a long flight and roughly matches what you will get from a MacBook. The life of the battery is also close to two hours compared to that obtained with the same test performed on my XPS 13 2018.
The high-resolution 4K display of the XPS 13 2019 also supports HDR video via Dolby Vision. The reflections are brighter and the blacks are darker and richer. There is not much content in Dolby Vision HDR yet, although YouTube has enough for me to see the difference. Dolby Vision is still relatively new and mainly used in televisions, although, as the XPS 13 shows, it is making its way to the computer world.
If you do not care about the 4K, but want to touch, a 1080p touch screen version is also available.
The keyboard and trackpad look identical to the previous model. I like the keyboard, but the trackpad still does not pick up the right clicks as well as I would like, a problem that I have been seeing for several iterations. It's easy to solve this problem by using two-finger clicks, but it hurts the reputation of an excellent trackpad.
The ports remain the same in this model. There are three USB-C ports, one for the power supply and two for the Thunderbolt 3. You also have a MicroSD card reader and a headphone jack. The first is a good way to extend the storage capacity of the low-end models XPS 13, although the card slightly exceeds the case. To thank those of us who keep our accessories for as long as possible, Dell includes a USB-C-to-USB-A dongle.
The Dell XPS 13 starts at $ 899 (a bit cheaper).see the configurations here). This model features an Intel Core i3 processor, 4GB of RAM and a 128GB SSD. I strongly suggest upgrading to $ 1,209 with a Core i5, 8GB RAM and a 256GB drive. Highly recommend the high end model that I have tested, which costs $ 1,430, although it is certainly expensive. For $ 600 more, you can add a 2 TB SSD.
If you want an elegant, reasonably powerful and lightweight machine in your bag, treat yourself to the latest XPS 13 – this time with a fantastic webcam.
. (tagsToTranslate) Shopping (t) Dell Laptop (t) Review (t)</pre></pre>
The Leica Q2 is a compact fixed-lens camera with a 47-megapixel full-frame sensor, a rangefinder-type electronic viewfinder, a waterproof case and an attractive price who will roll and hide your wallet. It's $ 5,000.
How is this going for a wave of reality? The price is not the only thing about this camera that could take it into consideration for most photographers. The Q2 does not have as many features as the other mirrorless cameras on the market, including Leica's, because you can not change lenses. You are stuck with the 28mm f1.7 lens included. It's unfortunate, and it's certainly an unusual choice for a $ 5,000 camera, but it's a Leica lens that produces incredible images.
The photos taken with such a camera have an indescribable quality: the photos are very sharp even with the open wide open; the funds blend into a smooth and creamy bokeh. Each scene seems frozen in glass, limpid and made faithful to the colors. There is a character in Leica's photos, and that character appears with every move you make on Q2. It is almost impossible to take a bad picture. Seriously, even daily photos of indoor plants and pets seem rich and vibrant, as a timeless moment carefully composed and captured in every detail.
Much of the character of Leica photos stems from the incomparable quality of the company's goals. Most of the company's housings and lenses produce north of five thousand inhabitants. So, if you look at Q2 from this point of view, it's almost to negotiate.
With a fixed lens, you lose the endless versatility offered by an interchangeable lens camera such as a digital SLR or a digital camera. standard camera without mirror like the Sony Alpha series. The 28mm lens is flexible. This is ideal for candids, street photography and most travel photographs. In fact, my 28mm lens is the one I use most often. Nevertheless, being stuck with one feels more stuffy.
The 28mm lens is not wide enough for breathtaking scenery and is not close enough for portraits. For portraits, I want something in a longer focal length, like a 85 mm or even a 50 mm. With the goal of the Leica Q2, I really have to put myself in front of someone. It simply can not perform multiple roles in the same way as other less expensive cameras.
It does have autofocus though. It's a fairly basic feature these days, but Leica has a strange relationship with autofocus. Leica's flagship mirrorless camera is the M Series. It's a full-frame digital range finder that supports interchangeable lenses, but it's only manual focusing. It's a philosophical design decision, and it's a fun exercise to slow down and use only the manual focus. It makes you really think about your composition, breathe and be in the moment. But it also means that you tend to lose a lot of these moments. That's why the Leica Q2 autofocus system is so important. This is a Leica rangefinder with autofocus. It's enormous.
In addition to autofocus, the Leica Q2 includes a standard range of modern equipment, such as Wi-Fi, video features and a rear touch screen. Transfer photos to your phone via Wi-Fi is quite simple with the Leica app, and the smartphone app is surprisingly intuitive. Most photo transfer applications offered by camera manufacturers are rather spartan, unresponsive and easy to use. But the Leica application has a simple and direct interface and the connection to the camera is a child's game.
Recording a video is just as easy, and with this huge 47 megapixel sensor, it records beautiful 4K videos at 24 or 30 frames per second. Again, the 28mm lens seems a bit limiting. I figured I could just switch to a flexible zoom as a 24-70mm lens every time I filmed.
The touch screen is responsive, bright and colorful. This absolutely does justice to the succulent photos produced by the Q2 sensor. The touch controls are an interesting addition. You can press to change your focal point and adjust the settings on the fly; The touch screen completes the physical controls well and is a pleasure to use. Physical controls are also designed logically. You do not need to navigate the menus to access important settings such as shutter speed, ISO, aperture and exposure compensation.
The difficulty lies in the sensor because it is one of the best in the market. Even the JPEG images produced by this sensor have a prominent dynamic range, and I've been able to adjust the exposure up or down without losing a lot of detail in Adobe Lightroom. The sensor is fantastic. I just could not help but wish to have more options of lenses.
If you really want to enter the Leica ecosystem and are ready to invest significant amounts in this business, the second quarter is not a very good starting point. This is an excellent camera with impeccable photo quality, but it is basically the best compact camera in the world. If you want more than one lens, you'd better spend five thousand dollars on a old body Leica M series and a lens used. In this way, your kit can grow with you.
But if you want autofocus and interchangeable lenses, this $ 5,000 will go much further in the ecosystems of Sony or Fujifilm. For example, the Fujifilm X-Pro 2, a cult-classic, can be found for about $ 1000 used. This is an excellent small range finder with interchangeable lenses and a similar quality undeniably ethereal to his pictures.
In fact, none of the these cameras without full frame mirror will give you a lot more for your money. Unfortunately, none of them has the Leica sensor, that 's why I still love the Q2 a lot despite its stubborn and irremovable purpose.
. (tagsToTranslate) Shopping (t) leica camera (t) camera (t) photo (t) review</pre></pre>
Founder Kyle Doerkson invented the Onewheel in 2014 to emulate the feeling of snowboarding on powder snow. The Onewheel + XR, which came out last year, was a larger and more powerful version of the original painting. The pint is the fun version of this year.
It is shorter, smaller and lighter than the XR and has a handle built into the wheel. you can practically wear it on your shoulder, like a continental soldier. It also has more security features, like Simplestop technology. On the XR, you had to lift the heel on the side of the front panel to stop. On the Pint, you can activate Simplestop on the application so that the table stops if you simply lean back.
I have 20 years of experience on boards – skateboarding, surfing and snow. Having the impression of digging into the powder is addictive, but I also know what it's like to tip your nose down a steep slope, and for a split second, think, "Oh, man. … I hope it will work. "
Even with the addition of new security features, I feel this feeling every time I ride on a wheel. I understand why so many people really love them! I am married to someone who does it! – But I'm going to stick to the skateboards for now.
At 23 pounds, the pint is only three pounds lighter than the XR. Overall, however, it seems a lot easier to carry. It is a few inches shorter, with a smaller and finer wheel. Instead of holding it by the end, you can carry it to your side thanks to the handle built into the wheel. I never felt that I was going to let it fall on my foot.
Perhaps the biggest difference is that with a full charge, the Pint has a range of 6 to 8 miles, compared to the XR from 12 to 18. During a week-long ride Without an hour-long goal in my neighborhood, and through gravel paths and parks, the battery ran out of battery every other day. If I used it to commute, I would keep a charger at work.
As with the XR, you can also choose different course profiles with Future Motion Digital Formatting – from beginner to advanced. The least aggressive and least responsive profile is Redwood, which reaches a maximum speed of 12 mph; Skyline has a top speed of 16 mph and is better suited for hills and trails. I liked the fluffy setting, Pacific, and my wife preferred Elevated, whose speeds reached 16 mph.
To start the card, you must engage the sensor on both halves of the front panel. Sometimes, the front panel does not feel my heels and the table does not start, but my wife, who is heavier than me, never had a problem. Overall, the smaller size of the Pint, its smaller wheel and thinner width make it much more responsive once in motion. On my first ride, I had a lot more swing than with the XR. Letting a little air out of the tire seemed to make it a little less winding, but not much.
If you have a lot of travel or navigate the streets of the city, you will probably appreciate the increased maneuverability. It's small enough and fast enough that you can even hunt small children while sitting around your kitchen table, although I do not recommend it if you regret having damaged your kitchen table.
It also features a new LED on the front panel indicating the remaining battery charge and a red taillight to make the map much easier to see at night.
Adorable, Future Motion has taken many steps to ensure that its boards are as safe as possible. The website and the application are full of warnings, advice and disclaimers. One of the changes brought by Future Motion was the introduction of Simplestop technology.
Getting out of Onewheel has always been one of the most difficult parts. Before, you had to lift the heel of one side of the front pad. If you have not erased one of the pads, pffft– You flew away and the painting continued. (That's how I sprained my knee last time I looked at one.) Amounting the pint, I heaved a sigh of silent relief whenever the board s & # 39; I stopped when I leaned back.
Another new security feature is refoulement. If you go too fast, on a steep slope or if you try to ride with too little battery, the nose of the board lifts and forces you to slow down or stop. When I asked Jack Mudd, chief evangelist of Onewheel, if it was possible to turn off the pushback in the same way that you clear Simplestop, I remembered that it was important to To prevent the riders from pushing the board beyond his abilities.
In theory, I appreciate this feature. The Pint always kindly reminded me to recharge before I moved too far from my house. And the last time I reviewed a Onewheel, I catapulted on a hill on which I was probably not supposed to be. This time, it was hard not to imagine the Future Motion engineers chuckling every time the board pitched on a gentle slope and I had to go down and walk.
But planks, electrical or otherwise, are not supposed to stop abruptly for no apparent apparent reason. I recruited my wife to test the speed of the Pint and when he did, the board got up. It's terrifying for both the experiment and for the witness at 16 mph.
He jumped and was able to land on his feet, skid on the street and go with just a burn to his ankle. But I recommend to buy the package with the wheel wing and wear skate shoes when you ride it.
Even with its limited range, the Pint is a much more useful and versatile Onewheel than the XR. It is much easier to transport and store. To hold it while walking in a restaurant to have lunch with a friend is like wearing a small suitcase.
And if you wait to be able to give you a Onewheel – who am I kidding, it is not possible that you still read this. You bought the painting as soon as you saw the picture. At $ 950, this is by far the most affordable price that Onewheel has been able to offer for a board that could be even more fun and certainly more practical than the XR.
But the Onewheel is not suitable for those who do not fear falling quickly and who do not fear falling. It has a learning curve that, in my opinion, actually makes it more of a toy – a toy that makes addicted, a favorite cult! – A suburban vehicle. Future Motion may have reproduced the feel of snowboarding, but when they can also replicate the sensation of planting their face on a fresh and mellow powder instead of a hot asphalt, I might be more prone to take one.
. (tagsToTranslate) electric vehicle</pre></pre>
Then, I rode the Turbo Creo SL Expert Evo in a headwind of more than 30 km / h at 20 miles per hour, and I began to see the wisdom in Specialized's new e-whip. If there is one thing that I fear as much as modern technology that diverts my humanity, it is a ruthless storm that makes me feel helpless and insignificant in the universe. Although it is nice to have a machine that improves my mental state in the wind, Specialized is more likely to follow the evolution of the NPD group. Performance of the 2018 bike class statistics, in which gravel and electric bicycles experienced exponential growth – respectively $ 20 million and $ 60 million – in sales compared to the previous year. Other categories, such as children's bikes, lifestyle bikes and road sport performance bikes, have dropped significantly.
This gravel version of the bike is incredibly light for an electric motor. At 29.7 pounds, this is not the lightest of the Creo fleet – it would be Evo's roadie cousin, the S-Works Creo SL of 26.8 lbs. But the components of the Evo keep the weight: a carbon frame Fact 11R; a magnesium battery built into the frame; carbon disc wheels; and a 4.2-pound engine, which delivers 240 watts to reach the maximum speed of 28 mph in the United States. Its three pedal assist modes, Eco, Sport and Turbo, can be micro-tuned to fit any driving style via Specialized's Mission Control app, but the "Turbo Connect" interface on the top tube shows all you need to know: power on. or off, the battery life and driving mode.
On the day of the arrival of the Evo, in ironic cosmic irony, a massive thunderstorm was shot down and cut off the power of my cabin. The breakdown lasted until dawn, making it impossible to load the bike during the night. But when the power came back, the bike charged as fast as Specialized had promised. In less than three hours, I had 80 km of built-in range, over 40 km more with the Range Extender loaded, an extra battery that fits into the bottle cage. In the middle of the morning, my boyfriend Brian and I were back in business.
Immediately after we began our climb on a gradual climb, the Evo took off, leaving Brian, a veteran ultra-gravel runner, in the dust. Beyond his obvious muscular power, the advanced engineering of the bike allowed him to ride smoothly with the almost silent whistling of the engine and the easy shifting of the 1x Shimano Ultegra Di2 group (the bike is equipped with an XT rear derailleur and an 11-42t cassette), and a dropper seat post that makes descents more comfortable. The Pathfinder Pro 38mm tires ate the sharp gravel without bursting and, unlike all the other bikes I've tried, the Evo felt light enough to did short of juice, I could pedal at home with relative ease.
While Evo was crossing the opposite wind, I felt superhuman, much like the days in my twenties when I mistakenly believed that my body was indestructible. But I still had a few moments left: my left hand became numb even when the bumps were a little softened by the updated Specialized Future Shock 2.0, a springs system between the head tube and the stem with an adjustable travel of 20 mm. And my knees were torque-tightened, perhaps because of the wide 181mm Q (distance between the pedal attachment points on the crank arms) and the heavier load to pedal when the engine was stopped or in Eco mode. Finally, since the bike must meet a maximum speed limit, it seemed slower than it should when pedaling at a maximum speed, which seemed inconsistent with its sleek and fast appearance (or in the countries other than the United States).
Apart from a few minor inconveniences, the Evo is beautifully designed and is a pleasure to ride – a consensus Brian, me and another cycling friend, came to have it after testing it in many conditions. Although I suspect that the proudly self-sufficient gravel crowd will be slow to adopt an electric bike category when racing in the near future, there are many other applications. This makes sense for cyclists who make difficult daily commutes, those who want to walk faster and harder, cyclists who want to relive the flawless power of their youth and cyclists with unlimited cash flow who want a fun toy that doubles as art. Yes, art: the work of psychedelic painting of the Evo sparkles and sparkles in the sun like an irresistible siren.
. (tagsToTranslate) e-bikes (t) performance (t) cycling</pre></pre>
tests Boosted & # 39; s Rev changed my mind and made me understand that electric scooters could be premium vehicles instead of fragile toys that end up at the bottom of a river. Unagi agrees: After a successful campaign with Kickstarter last fall, the company recently began marketing its first flagship product, the Model One.
Unlike the very beefy Rev, the Unagi Model One is much lighter, thinner and more portable. I pilot the two-engine version of Unagi for a week. Overall, I still think the utility of an e-scooter is a bit limited, but I think it's a fun niche.
Right now, there is a big difference between Model One and Rev. The Rev weighs 46 pounds and came in a box so big that I had to struggle to get it through the front door. The Model One is relatively lightweight and weighs 24.24 pounds. He arrived in a package that I could hoist with one hand.
The stylish frame of the Model One is made of aluminum, magnesium and carbon fiber, with a 5-inch-wide adherent bridge. Women's shoes size 7.5 are fine, but bigger feet may get stuck a little.
The 7.5-inch wheels are lined with a set of eye-catching "tires" made of a rubber-coated, rubber-shaped perforated frame. With this design, you'll never have to worry about punctures again, but in practice, these rigid rubber discs have very little to offer – if the road is cracked or bumpy, you'll feel it in the back.
On the handlebars you will find the simple console. A power button turns the scooter on and off. A thumb lever on the left controls the brake; a thumb paddle on the right serves as an accelerator. There is also a small tab for toot the most annoying horn on the planet. The acute and treble electronic squeak resounds like the sound that an iPhone would make if it had an alert "You're on fire". Another small tab on the handlebars switches between driving modes: beginner, intermediate and advanced.
There are two models of Unagi: the single-engine E250 and the twin-engine E450. The company has lent me the most powerful model, with a dedicated engine in each wheel. On this model, you can switch between single-engine and twin-engine modes, and I really liked this feature even though it's not particularly intuitive. (I had to read the manual to find out how to do it.) If the ride is long, it's a good idea to switch it to single-engine and low-intensity "beginner" driving to save battery power. The scooter has an estimated range of 15.5 miles, but I climbed it for six miles with the lowest settings and only used 20% of the battery.
Switching to dual engine mode releases more punch. The single-engine mode has an instantaneous maximum power of only 500 watts, while the twin engine reaches 900 watts. On clean, smooth roads in twin-engine mode, I quickly reached 15 mph without any problems.
And while Bartleby's Model One straight left me on even modest hills in single-engine mode ("I'd rather not do it!"), The twin-engine mode allowed me to climb most of the steepest slopes from my neighborhood. . I had to slow down the throttle to bring it to a tilt of up to about 7mph up to 20%, and I guess anyone bigger than me (a woman 5 '2 ") would likely have difficulty climbing.
And of course, the dual-engine mode uses the battery much faster. A steep hill in twin-engine mode used the battery 10% in less than 20 minutes. However, Unagi's CEO, David Hyman, has reported in an email that the vast majority of scooter rides are less than three miles away. If this applies to your home-to-work commutes, like mine, a full charge would probably be enough to cover several days of double-engine scooters.
In many ways, a lighter scooter like Unagi is much more versatile. When the stem is folded, it is easy to carry with one hand. I do not struggle to carry it in and out of my house or put it in the trunk of my car. I felt good using a U-bolt on the handlebar stem when I dropped something at my child's school. It also fits in a grocery basket, although I recommend you do not crush your bag of cherry tomatoes.
But as with the other scooters that I've tested, the utility is limited. With Unagi's small and stiff wheels, I found myself breaking cracks that I might have otherwise fueled. It is equipped with drum brakes instead of discs and its IP54 degree of protection only protects against the ingress of dust and splashing water. Without disc brakes, I would not feel safe when it was raining.
And unfortunately, he suffers a bit of the Segway problem– I look and feel a little silly and remarkable when I drive one. Despite improvements such as the gray aluminum frame and sieved gray carbon, it is by no means very different from rented rental scooters that always provoke (in other people, not me) an irresistible urge to throw them on a bridge nearby.
With regard to scooters, however, I think Unagi occupies a useful intermediate position. It has a little more juice than the Xiaomi M365but it's noticeably lighter and more affordable than Boosted Rev. If you want to shave a few kilometers off the odometer of your car without having to make a putter like a putz, the Unagi Model One is perhaps the right electric scooter for you.
. (tagsToTranslate) Shopping (t) scooters</pre></pre>
The DJI Robomaster S1 Robot comes from robot Robomaster competitions in China. This is a mainstream version of the robots that kids build in your local STEM-friendly school. As such, it's not just a robot; It is a learning experience. You build it, program it and fight other robots with it.
The Robomaster arrives in 23 pieces with 101 screws and a reversible screwdriver to assemble it. It took about three hours for my children and me to put it together.
The instructions contain line drawings and all the parts are labeled to let you know what is going on where. That said, there is almost no text, just pictures. At certain stages, especially the wheel assembly, a sentence or two would have saved a considerable effort trying to decipher the line drawings.
Once the assembly is complete, you will have a four-wheeled robot with a swivel turret mounted on a frame the size of a shoebox. The turret can fire infrared light or small gel pellets. The S1 comes with a bottle of pellets, but you must let them soak for a few hours until they reach the size of a small grape. They do not hurt when they hit you, but DJI has limited the firing angle of the turret to stay focused on the other robots. Some modes, such as tracking a person, are not available when the pellets are in the S1. This robot is not aiming for any harm.
Everything about the S1 is extremely robust and well built. It's mainly plastic, but it's tough plastic. When you finish building it, the S1 stands as a solid piece of equipment, even more than one of DJI's drones. (Because weight is not a problem, the S1 can afford to be more robust than a flying drone.) The S1 is well balanced and very easy to control. Despite my best efforts, I never managed to return it.
One of the most striking aspects of the S1's operation is that it does not rotate, it moves sideways. This design is made possible by the Mecanum wheels, a conventional wheel with a series of rollers set at a 45 degree angle. The rollers rotate 45 degrees to the rotation of the wheel, driving the vehicle laterally.
You control the S1 via the Robomaster mobile app for iOS and Android. After pairing with the Robomaster app, you can move with a joystick to the screen and see through the turret. There are three basic modes in the application: Solo, Battle and Lab.In Solo mode, you control S1 alone and Battle mode allows you to fight with other S1. The Lab mode allows you to experiment and write programs to control the S1.
As with the drones of DJI, there is a controller sold separately. The RoboMaster S1 Gamepad at $ 79 (also available at B & H) offers a mounting area large enough to hold an iPad and has a physical joystick for more precise control than that obtained with the virtual joystick of the application. If you are planning to fight other S1 robots or if you simply want a more strict direction and goal, I highly recommend switching to the gamepad.
The body of the S1 is surrounded by 31 sensors that capture everything from infrared light to physical impacts, as well as a camera that can record 1080p video. These sensors allow the S1 to navigate and you can use them in the programming interface. Programs can be written in Scratch, a child-friendly drag-and-drop programming interface, or Python. The Lab part of the application offers a series of training courses designed for children to start writing basic programs to control the S1.
The Robomaster is for children ages 14 and up, although my 4 and 7 year olds had a great time helping me set everything up. For the youngest, what you really have is a $ 500 remote controlled car. My kids had a great time building the Robomaster and then driving them in "my laser – controlled remote control car", as my son calls it. It also pulls these beads of water, which is really great for kids of any age, including me (it's so much harder to hit things with water pearls).
None of this is enough to justify the price of S1, but programmability could. The learning does not stop when you have finished assembling the S1; it's just when it starts. The Robomaster is more of a STEM project than a remote controlled car with laser shooting.
The courses available through the application and on the DJI website offer everything you need to start writing programs in Scratch. The Python interface is also not documented, and it's probably not a good way to learn Python because of the complexity of robot control. Unless you already know Python, I would suggest using Scratch to program the S1, especially for kids.
There is also a RoboAcademy section in the app that offers background glimpses of the S1's technology. For example, there is a deep dive in the way the Mecanum wheels work in the S1.
The S1 was a ton of fun to test. This is a well done and thoughtful introduction to robotics and programming. This is not cheap, but for kids who are old enough and interested in STEM topics or programming, the S1 is a fantastic introduction to the world of robotics.
. (tagsToTranslate) Shopping (t) review (s) DJI (t) drone</pre></pre>