Bill Gates is, in every way, a successful retired businessman – one of the most successful businessmen ever to have lived – by any traditional measure of wealth or impact on wealth. the world. For better or for worse, Windows is functionally powered by the majority of the consumer PC revolution, especially during the Internet-driven boom of the late 1990s and early 2000s. according to Gates, his biggest mistake was not to see the threat presented by Android and miss the mark when it came to ensure that Microsoft continues to dominate the phones in the same way he had dominated mobile .
In an interview with Global Village, VC, Gates revealed what has views like her greatest miss.
In the world of software, especially for platforms, these are winning markets for everyone. The biggest mistake of all time is therefore the mismanagement in which I committed that Microsoft did not look like Android. In other words, Android is the standard non-Apple phone platform. It was a natural thing for Microsoft to win. It's really the winner who takes everything. If you have two times less applications or 90% of applications, you are about to finish. There is room for exactly one non-Apple operating system and what is its value? $ 400 billion that would be transferred from G to M
On the one hand, he is not mistaken and this is not the only category of products that Microsoft has not managed to win. A few years ago, an article became viral for reporting that Bill Gates had correctly guessed 15 distinct predictions that would occur (or would have come close enough), and Microsoft has either a limited presence or no presence in any of the 15 markets . This is not necessarily a proof of failure, because in most cases, Microsoft has never even tried to penetrate the space. What says a lot, however, is the difference between seeing the potential of how the market will evolve and having a business plan to become the pivotal one that will dictate the course of this evolution . It should also be noted that Gates was not the CEO of Microsoft at that time, after his resignation in 2000. Steve Ballmer was running the company with Gates apart as the chief software architect.
Of course, Gates is not wrong Microsoft has undeniably missed the mobile revolution. His phone operating systems were years behind in the evening. I've often had the impression that Windows Mobile (which had enjoyed some success) had the success that the latest Windows Phone deserved, in what could be described as cosmic karma, but that could also be perceived as the vagaries of the market and human nature. What is interesting about this new period, in my opinion, is that it is simply impossible to claim that Microsoft and Intel have not made enormous efforts to succeed in the mobile market. Both did.
For Microsoft, this involved the entire push of the Surface device, the porting of Windows 8 to ARM, and a desired market for slates and tablets that did not materialize. For Intel, he focused on writing his own open source operating system (Moblin, MeeGo, Tizen) and inventing a new type of low-power processor to serve those markets. Intel and Microsoft had smart engineers who understood the need for new products to meet new markets. What they lacked was to understand what types of products would be successful. Intel's ideas for MIDs (Mobile Internet Devices) included large keypads, small displays, and generally undesirable form factors. Microsoft's Windows Mobile devices at the time before Android were phones equipped with a keyboard, though, honestly, that's what everyone was building – BlackBerry did not build an empire based on the idea that everyone wanted touch screens.
It would be easy to stop the criticism and say that Microsoft lacked Android because it lacked the importance of touch screens. I think, however, that the current problem goes further. From what I understood, with Microsoft, particularly at that time, the question of the company was always to know "How does this fit into our current market of products?" Windows and Office? " perfect meaning for Microsoft to ask. But it is also an issue that tends to function as a form of lock-in. If you start thinking about a mobile product from the point of view "How do we provide Windows and Office features?" The UX and UI elements you will use come directly from the Windows / Office paradigms that people already know. . This is what Windows Mobile, based on Windows CE, has tried to offer. This is not an approach that fits well with what people actually have selected to use, though, and this is an idea that prompted Microsoft to think about how to use phones in a much more restrictive way than Apple or Android, which invented new user interface concepts to accompany their touch architectures.
The fact that Microsoft has adopted such a different visual design for Windows Phone 7 is proof that the company was able to think outside the box and create its own new and distinct visual language. The problem is that Microsoft did not start early enough. Steve Ballmer's reaction to the iPhone is one of the most infamous remarks in history. Asked about the device, Ballmer said USA Today: There is no chance that the iPhone gets a significant market share. No chance. "
But I can not mess up Ballmer for that. Because if I am really Honestly, I did not see it coming either. In 2007, I did not have a great opinion about the iPhone, but I honestly believed that tablets would not cannibalize the computer market in 2011. Like Ballmer, I thought that a physical keyboard was a critical factor for many people. . Like Ballmer, I was wrong. Although I get paid to watch technology trends and see what's coming up, I thought the PC market was mostly driven by people needing a keyboard. Why because I need a keyboard. To this day, the idea of doing all my writing on an iPad or equivalent gives me hives.
That's why I'm not sure Bill Gates can really claim that the value of what Android would become for Google is his error I guess it was the mistake of a very large number of people, most of whom were more directly responsible for Microsoft than him.
To really catch the wave, Microsoft should have started working much earlier than on a Windows Phone product, and it would have had to follow a radically different strategy. do not have focus on her two biggest cash cows. It is extremely rare for large companies to pivot that elegantly, let alone earlier, and we are well placed at the forefront: being a large successful business in a marketplace does not necessarily help you to succeed in another. If that were the case, Intel and Microsoft would be the owners of the mobile sector right now.
Top Image Credit: Bill Gates (photo by JP Yim / Getty Images)
Based on Corsair's Ironclaw RGB, the Iron RGB Wireless enter the market with a similar overall design that also has some notable changes. First of all, it's the feature that gives this mouse its name: it has a built-in battery and can be used wirelessly. Corsair has also equipped the mouse with some additional buttons that give it a somewhat different feel than the original Ironclaw RGB.
For a product with RGB literally written in his name, this gaming mouse You have surprisingly few LED lights. There are some bright RGB LED light areas on the front of the mouse; one below the scroll wheel, and the Corsair emblem on the palm rest is illuminated by RGB LED lights There are also some LEDs on the left side of the mouse, but they indicate the configuration settings that you are currently using. Most of these lights will not be visible when the mouse is in use, making it a bad choice if you're looking for a mouse that delivers true light.
At the heart of this mouse is a Pixart PMW3391 optical sensor with a resolution of 18,000 dpi. This offers greater accuracy than the PMW3367 Pixart inside the Dark Core RGB SE by Corsair wireless mouse, and it also carries a better DPI index than Logitech G502 Lightspeed the mouse
The traditional left and right click buttons on this mouse use Omron switches that are more responsive than traditional mouse buttons and can last up to 50 million clicks. This mouse also has a clickable scroll wheel, two DPI buttons directly below the scroll wheel, and five buttons on the left side. All of these buttons can be programmed to perform the desired functions.
Corsair has designed the Ironclaw RGB Wireless with a large outer shell that should fit larger hands more comfortably than your regular mouse. Mike Epstein said in his review PCMag that the overall design seemed nice and that his fingers naturally fell on the buttons, but as it is one of the biggest gaming mice on the market, you should consider something else if you have small hands.
The Corsair Ironclaw RGB Wireless comes with a 2.4GHz Wi-Fi USB sensor that uses Corsair's Slipstream technology. The company said it should allow the mouse to run at less than 1 ms latency and give it an edge over Corsair's Dark Dark RGB SE when using the wireless key. It also works via Bluetooth, as well as in wired mode when it is connected to the USB charging cable. Unlike Dark Core RGB SE, the Ironclaw RGB Wireless does not support wireless charging.
With a set of competitive features and a price of $ 80, the Ironclaw RGB Wireless is a great option for those who buy a wireless gaming mouse. As it lacks wireless charging, it may not be the best solution for everyone.
The Logitech G502 Lightspeed offers similar performance and includes wireless charging, although this mouse is also significantly more expensive at $ 149.99. Corsair's Dark Core RGB SE processor is also an effective alternative to wireless charging. It is currently on sale for $ 69.99, but the wireless charging pad will cost you $ 79.99 more. In all respects, the Ironclaw RGB Iron is a good option.
Last year, Phil Spencer told the crowd at E3 that Microsoft was focusing on building its next generation of consoles, in the plural. Spencer told Microsoft that Microsoft is "deeply involved in the architecture of upcoming Xbox consoles", in the plural. Now the company has changed its plans – but she does not necessarily want to admit it publicly.
In a recent interview with Business Insider, Spencer Hedged said his statements were referring to the diskless Xbox One S and the now somewhat detailed enhancements for Xbox Next, still unbranded. "Last year, we talked about consoles, we have already shipped consoles and detailed another console, I think it's plural," Spencer said. But according to other sources in society, it is only a small attempt to avoid recognizing that the plans of society have changed.
Initially, Microsoft was going to build two devices – a high-end product (Anaconda) and a low-end model (Lockhart). The link between these names and the codename "Project Scarlett" that had also filtered was never entirely clear, although Scarlett referred to the entire Xbox Next platform (software and hardware) , while Anaconda was the code name for console hardware only. Regardless of the evolution of code names, it is now planned to market the unique high-end console under the Scarlett project code name.
Apparently, Microsoft has changed its plans for several reasons. First of all, the company had problems with the developers, who focused on creating an experience that worked well on the low-end Lockhart device before stepping it up for Anaconda. This may introduce quality differences that might not please Microsoft in the inevitable comparisons between Xbox and PS5. This point was also heard by Digital Foundry at E3, which gives it some credibility.
The other offset argument concerns xCloud and the availability of streaming. Lockhart's intention was to open new markets to the Xbox players who might be put off by the higher price ordered by Anaconda. But if this space can be reached by xCloud and the game in streaming, then Lockhart has no interest. Consumer buying habits and declining sales of physical game media would have been closely examined here, as the two markets do not necessarily overlap. In fact, one might think that low-end players who would otherwise be attracted to Lockhart would initially be ill-suited to xCloud because they are less likely to live in areas with high Internet speeds and low connections. latency required. . This is true or not, it was obviously a problem important enough to prevent the cancellation of the lower console.
One of the interesting questions about the current generation that I would like Sony and Microsoft to answer (which will probably not be the case) is the initial sales quality of the Xbox One X and the Sony PS4 Pro. Sony only publishes the sales figures of its consoles, while all sales estimates of Xbox One are well estimates: Microsoft has stopped publishing these figures as soon as it became clear that its console was going to hold about the same. half of Sony's market share. Today, it is estimated that the X4 has been sold more than 2: 1 by the PS4.
The irony here is of course that in adopting the concept of mid-generation upgrades, console manufacturers have weakened the idea of a "generation". The computer gaming industry has never really adopted this framing, except by proxy. The reason is simple: we do not need it. If you have an Ivy Bridge processor and an Nvidia RTX card, you have two completely different "generations" of hardware – and it turns out they get along very well.
The only reason that Microsoft is phasing out the current generation of Xbox systems instead of keeping them on the market to give them an entry-level experience with next-generation games, is ultimately to simplify things for developers and consumers who are not. You are not used to this kind of problem in games. As for knowing it's wise to favor a single console model rather than two, we need to know the expected price. Microsoft and Sony do not want to talk about it yet.
According to rumors, Intel could prepare to significantly reduce the price of its processors, with the upcoming launch of the AMD Ryzen 3000 family. What is less clear is if it represents a real potential outcome or simply wishful thinking.
According to DigiTimes (subscription necessary), Intel could reduce processor prices by up to 15 percent in response to AMD's upcoming Ryzen parts and has already informed motherboard manufacturers of this change. It is possible that Intel will take this step, but judging by the company's actions since AMD introduced Ryzen in 2017, it is rather unlikely.
Intel has taken several important steps to improve its products in the months leading up to the launch of Ryzen. He added hyper-threading to some processors in the Pentium class, and then, with the 8th generation family, increased the number of cores on his various processors. Similarly, the HEDT Skylake family of pieces has increased the number of base pieces at the same price. Intel's six-core and eight-core processors are about half the price they were four to six years ago.
What Intel has not done all this time is actually a reduction of its CPU. the prices as such. Instead, the company simply waited until the time came to introduce a new generation of parts and position the new processors more favorably than the old ones. This allowed Chipzilla to adjust its prices to take into account AMD 's competitiveness without launching into titles such as "Intel could reduce the price of its processor before the launch of Ryzen 3000 by AMD".
Intel does not want to see prices directly because it means you have competition in the first place. Not only that, but the fact that Intel's HEDT components are priced, even in the face of AMD's high performance Threadripper competition, means that the company has not faced much of the current threat of these chips. If users aggressively transferred their workstation purchases from Xeon to TR, Intel would have been forced to react. The fact that he did not suggest that they had not done it.
Intel chief executive Bob Swan has previously admitted that his company expects increased AMD competition in the server market and that gross margins could suffer, which would imply that some price cuts could take place, but not where society would prevail. Currently, the high-end parts of Intel are those where are virtually the essential price differences. An eight-core Intel processor can cost around $ 500 versus $ 300 for an AMD equivalent, but a 16-core AMD processor costs $ 829 on Newegg, while a 16-core Intel Core i9 Skylake X processor costs 1,700. USD. It would take more than 15% of the price to bring the two chips to parity.
Based on Intel's actions to date and its competitive response to Ryzen, we believe the company will reduce its prices as much as necessary. It may not be ready to happen before the launch of the Ryzen 3000 family and may choose to focus on lowering prices on specific SKUs for which it needs to improve its competitiveness rather than significantly reducing costs. At the same time, the room for maneuvering Intel to achieve certain price cuts, at least on some parts, is unclear. We will have to see how Ryzen 7nm parts stand out before saying more.
In this review, we examine Logitech G502 Lightspeed Wireless Gaming Mouse, a high-performance, innovative gaming mouse that supports wireless charging. For PC gamers, a high-performance gaming mouse is just as important as a fast graphics card or processor. Technically, any old mouse will allow you to play a game. But a good gaming mouse will have better performance and give you an edge while playing with your friends online.
However, what makes a good gaming mouse is the subject of intense controversy among PC gamers, with one of the most argued arguments about wireless gaming mice. Some see wireless gaming mice because they do not have a cable on which to slide, the wireless mouse being less efficient because of their low battery capacity and the increased latency caused by the wireless communication with a PC. The Logitech G502 Lightspeed, with its wireless charging system, offers a possible solution to these problems, but at a price that you might find unsavory.
The Logitech G502 Lightspeed uses a 16K Hero Optical Sensor capable of reading over 400 IPS. It also has an optical protection factor of 16,000, and Logitech noted that its latest generation products were 10 times more efficient.
The right-facing mouse weighs 4 ounces (114 g), but can be raised to 4.6 ounces (130 g) if, like me, you prefer the mouse with a little more weight. The mouse also has two RGB LED light zones that can be adjusted to different types of light according to your tastes. Logitech also equipped this mouse with a total of 11 buttons, all fully programmable, including the main mouse buttons.
The Lightspeed G502 takes advantage of Logitech's Lightspeed wireless technology to establish a connection with extremely low delay. It can also be used as a wired game mouse if you simply connect it using the USB charging cable.
The Logitech PowerPlay mouse pad, priced at $ 99.99. This rather expensive mouse pad is what makes the G502 Lightspeed really stand out from the competition, as it serves as both a wireless charging platform and a wireless receiver. This means that the mouse will never die when it is used with the PowerPlay mouse pad, because it will still be in charge until you lift it too far from the counter. There will also be a significant improvement as the distance between the transmitter and receiver is reduced to the point where they are in the direction of transmission. .
PCMag reports that during testing, the use of the mouse was exceptionally comfortable and that the reviewer did not encounter any noticeable bug when using the mouse. He also noted that you could not see the RGB LED lights directly when the mouse was in use, but I do not personally agree with that, as can be said of almost all RGB LED mice.
If we quickly add some competitive products, such as Dark Core RGB SE by CorsairIt should be noted that the Logitech G502 is a little late. This mouse is not only half the price of Logitech G502, but it also supports wireless charging on a cheaper $ 79.99 mouse pad and a similar high-end 16,000 DPI optical sensor. In this comparison, things get worse for Logitech when you consider that the Dark Core RGB SE also supports wireless Bluetooth and Wi-Fi 2.4G connections. The Logitech G502 may not be bad, but its price is considerably higher than that, and it seems unjustified to make a frontal comparison of the specifications.
You may be able to play at Mondial 1-1 of Super Mario Bros. eyes closed, but can you play it at the speed of lightning while other Marios throw you turtle shells? Maybe someone else is probably better. You can find out by playing Mario Royale in your browser right now. Do not wait too long, though. Nintendo is sure to get this purged internet game soon.
As its name indicates, Mario Royale is a royal battle style game based on Super Mario Bros. (original of NES). If Tetris can turn into a royal battle, why not Mario?
Each round starts with 75 players in a crazy race for the finish line, but that number will quickly drop by half. The game showcases you, but there are dozens of semi-translucent Marios around you playing the same game in the same environment. Some of them will meet a Goomba and others will fall into a hole, but even if you do not make a mistake, you can not win unless you are quick.
Mario Royale is a race, but it's not only about speed. The first three players to complete four randomly selected stages among Super Mario Bros. or The Lost Levels are in the winner's circle. While two Marios can not crash, they can use shells and bonuses to eliminate competition. Only one person can get each power up, which makes them very useful. It's about knowing how to balance power-ups, speed and level awareness.
You only need a browser and a keyboard to start playing, but the controllers are also supported. The keyboard controls are simple, as can be expected from this game: WASD to move and space to jump.
Mario Royale comes from YouTuber and developer InfernoPlus, who recognizes the trailer he fully expects. Nintendo have a problem with this game. The company has always worked on fan projects, as fantastic as they are. The game includes a disclaimer when loading that indicates that the code base is the property of InfernoPlus. Of course, Nintendo owns the characters and will not fail to call for a long time. The disclaimer also politely asks Nintendo not to file a scary lawsuit. At the time of publishing this publication, a few thousand people online are playing the game. The lawyers will soon intervene.