By Shannon Connellan and Johnny Location
Announced on Tuesday, the company will implement a "one-time strike" policy that will prohibit anyone who violates the standards of the social network community from using Facebook Live.
Users who violate the most serious rules of the network will be prohibited from using Live for a certain period of time, starting from their first offense. An example of an offense is a user who "shares a link to a statement of a terrorist group without context".
Guy Rosen, Vice President of Integrity of Facebook, said in the blog that the company's goal was to "minimize the risk of abuse on Live while allowing users to use Live live every day ".
Rosen said these restrictions will be extended to other areas of the platform over the next few weeks, starting with the restriction barring users from placing ads.
Previously, Facebook had simply removed content that violated its community standards. If this person continued posting raping content, they would be stuck on the platform for a while. Some have been totally banned.
The restrictions apply to according to an updated definition in , which has seen the ban of many controversial personalities, including Alex Jones, the leader of the Nation of Islam, Louis Farrakhan, Milo Yiannopoulos and others.
In addition to these new live broadcast restrictions, Facebook has also declared investing in research to prevent incidents such as the rapid spread of the video shooter in Christchurch, which has been modified to avoid detection and allow remail.
The company will invest in a $ 7.5 million partnership with three universities: the University of Maryland, Cornell University and the University of California, Berkeley.
The money will go in search for better detection of images, video and audio handled, which could also help handle problems such as deepfakes.
(tagsToTranslate) facebook (t) livestreaming (t) facebook-live (t) tech (t) cybersecurity (t) social media companies</pre></pre>
By TEAM COMMERCEMashable Offers
The best part of online protection with a VPN, or virtual private network, is that you save a lot of money to protect your non-digital life. Home security systems cost hundreds, if not thousands, and a bodyguard would probably be excessive (although rather cool). When it comes to your online data, such as e-mails, photos, banking and identity information, you can pay only $ 32 and never lift a finger again. Obtain a lifetime subscription to Ivacy VPN today for only $ 31.99 with code APRILSAVE20.
What makes this VPN worth it? Good question
For starters, he is associated with the National Cyber Security Alliance. So you know that your privacy is the top priority of the company. He also won The fastest VPN price from BestVPN.comwhich means it's one of the best options to stay protected without slowing down streaming services. You can not risk that during the last season of GoT.
Regarding the essential details, Ivacy VPN Protects your digital footprint with powerful 256-bit encryption, allowing you to protect yourself from hackers, spyware and government surveillance. It uses P2P file sharing and anonymous browsing, and it bypasses geographical restrictions so you can enjoy your favorite content without any annoyance abroad. It has more than 1,000 servers spread over more than 100 sites around the world. It even overcomes the speed limit of Internet access providers and allows you to simultaneously connect to five different devices. TL; DR: It offers all the features that deserve your attention in a VPN, at an incredibly low price.
On sale for $ 39.99, you can get lifetime protection for only $ 31.99 when you enter the code APRILSAVE20 at the register.
An Irish politician discovered this the hard way when I found out why he did not stop finding the battery of his exhausted laptop. It turns out that his kids were using his campaign pamphlets – which included a picture of his face – to bypass the facial recognition lock on his computer.
"So, I was wondering why my laptop's battery was exhausting every time I left it at home," said Sinn Féin MEP Matt Carthy, who represents the Midlands Northwest constituency. . tweeted on Tuesday. "It turns out that the kids used the brochures of my choice to get through the facial recognition lock …"
I was wondering why my laptop's battery was exhausted every time I left it at home.
It turns out that the kids used the brochures of my choice to get through the facial recognition lock …
I do not know whether to be proud of the interested or stealthy? pic.twitter.com/rtDsuNRB8B
– Matt Carthy, MEP (@mattcarthy) April 23, 2019
Yeah, they're not really elite hackers, but effective anyway.
This is of course not the first time that supposedly sophisticated facial recognition systems have been defeated with a single photo. Just last summer, Mashable managed to cheat the face of OnePlus 6 with a printed mask. In general, experts consider this form of biometric security as a questionable method to better secure your phone or computer.
Carthy, however, has mixed feelings about the property.
"I'm not sure I'm proud of spirit or concerned about stealth," he wrote about his children.
And if what the politician thinks of the ingenuity of his children is his business, we have a suggestion for him: start using a alphanumeric password.
Follow @https: //twitter.com/PCMag
As Quartz ratios, CBP is already using facial recognition technology in the United States. airports. The system works by capturing a photo of a passenger at the approach of the airport boarding gate. The image is then compared to visa and passport applications for eventual correspondence to create an "exit record". The lack of correspondence does not allow the person to take a closer look at the CBP.
In the 2018 Homeland Security Entry and Exit Report, it is stated (on page 11) that CBP intends to expand the use of this information. so-called biometric exit over the next four years: US travelers. "The reason? The technology is very reliable and therefore very effective in detecting people classified as overtime with a visa.
The 15 airports already used in face recognition have 15,000 flights and more than two million passengers use the biometric exit system. Of these, more than 7,000 passengers were detected as additional costs. Since the system only started in 2017, you can understand why CBP considers facial recognition as an important tool to use in all airports. The system was also essential for identify an impostor last year and blocking his entry to the United States
For the moment, any airport using the new technology will continue to rely on flight manifests from departing airlines. However, once installed on all US airports, it is thought that the same technology will begin to be introduced at land borders, too.
This article was originally published on PCMag
The problem with embedded browsers, as Skelker explains, is that it is Google users susceptible to phishing attacks from malicious actors.
Previously, third-party developers could add Web browser instances, such as the Chromium Embedded Framework, to their applications. This allowed users to connect to the service with their existing Google Account without having to sign up for a new account on a brand new platform.
Although embedded browsers have facilitated the registration and login of an application user, it has also simplified the task of a hacker so that he can lead an attack phishing type. Malicious actors could use built-in browser frameworks to listen to an unsuspecting user and steal their login credentials.
Unfortunately, Google can not differentiate legitimate connections from phishing attacks via built-in browser environments. For this reason, the company decided to accept this method from the outset.
The company urges developers using embedded browsers to switch to browser-based OAuth authentication. Basically, when a user wants to connect to a third-party application with the help of his or her Google Account, the app opens the Google login page via his or her mobile browser. In this way, users can view the site's URL in order to make sure it's a legitimate Google page and not a site imposter. Web phishing.